is human ready?

You ship more code than ever. Is any of it actually working?

Agents write and review most of it now, and they catch a lot. What they cannot do is open your product and feel that something is off. A person can, in about a minute, and that minute costs less than the tokens you burn asking a model to guess.

Pay, then book your onboarding call.

Where an agent stops being useful

You ship a change that touches a shared component.

Agent

It reads the diff, decides the blast radius looks small, and never opens the one screen where that component is now broken. You pay for a long run that concludes everything is fine.

Person

They click through the flow, see it, and tell you which screen. Under a minute.

You ship all week and never open the site on a phone.

Agent

Every assertion passes, because the layout is technically rendering. Nothing in the run tells you the button sits under the keyboard on a real handset.

Person

They pick up a phone and the problem is obvious in the first screenshot.

One plan

$200/month

  • 20feature tests, each one a change you want a person to check
  • 10complete onboarding walkthroughs, if you spend the credits that way instead
  • Humanevery test run by a person, which is the entire point
  • Yoursresults land in Slack, GitHub, or wherever your team already looks
We fit it to your existing testing setup on the onboarding call.

Who runs the tests

Benny

Benny

He did YC S24 with Comfy Deploy, putting AI infrastructure into production for other companies. In 2026 he joined Coreflow, a top 50 AI company, and did the same for their stack. A lot of that work was cutting cost by self-hosting. Now he does it here.

ishumanready.comTested by people.